Buty Obuwie

Six high-paying side hustles you can start for free

· The South African

Whether you’re filling your tank, planning a holiday, or paying off debt, your bank balance may be leaving hints it’s time for a side hustle. You have a million-and-one choices to make money online or in-person, but very few actually pay.

These are your options in South Africa.

Visit sweetbonanza.qpon for more information.

The 6 Side hustles paying real money

Every side hustle requires effort, especially those that don’t need any cash to get started. When the barrier to entry is low, there’s plenty of competition. Expect to apply yourself to maintain your income.

Self-Publishing Activity Books

You can write or illustrate a book. You might think there’s money involved in starting. But if you use services like Canva, you can create a colouring book or activity book and sell it worldwide through services like Amazon KDP. These services print the book whenever someone orders it. They deduct printing and other fees from your book’s price.

Some self-publishers report making upwards of R6 000 a month publishing multiple print-on-demand colouring books.

Modelling and Acting

You don’t need to be South Africa’s next top model to land a gig as a model or actor. There are plenty of options for finding work. Background work, for example, allows you to earn roughly R450 per gig. There’s also the option to become a commercial model and make more per shoot.

On-demand Deliveries

As a delivery driver, your passengers are inanimate, meaning no mess and no low ratings. If you do last-mile deliveries through a service like Picup, you can use your car or bakkie, fill it with parcels and earn whenever you’re available. Many last-mile delivery drivers who work for companies like Makro and Dischem work on weekends.

After deducting fuel and car maintenance costs, you could earn an additional R2 000 a month for a few days of work, especially during peak periods like month-end.

Bargain Hunting and Reselling

Why not become the connection between your colleagues and friends and cheaper products? Find out what they’re looking for and offer to help them purchase the product at a discounted rate. Once they know you have connections, they will ask you to help. Then add a finder’s fee to your purchase.

You won’t make millions, but could make a few extra thousand a month.

Online Course Creation

There are people, albeit not as many as there once were, who purchase online courses. Offer your expertise in a skill others want; create a presentation and accompany it with a voice-over to sell through a service like Udemy. Promote your expertise through TikTok and link to the course. You can make more than R1 000 a month, passively.

Quality Assurance and Artificial Intelligence Training

With unlimited Wi-Fi or data and an ability to follow instructions, you can work part-time in quality assurance (QA) through a service like test.io. Rather than earning pennies playing online games, these QA jobs pay per gig or per bug you identify. The amounts are meagre, roughly R32 per bug, but it’s work you can do in your spare time.

You could also pivot to training artificial intelligence. The pay is more competitive if you have expertise in a field Large Language Models (LLMs) want to refine.

Czytaj dalej u źródła

Can Burnham's vision for Manchester's schools really work for the rest of England?

· BBC News

Not What Judges Want to See from Litigants

· Reason

From today's sanctions order in Copycat Legal PLLC v. Peralo, by Judge David Leibowitz (S.D. Fla.), entered on the court's own initiative (the defendant is described in the Complaint as "a digital content creator who primarily focuses on producing videos in short form for his YouTube, TikTok, SnapChat, and Instagram viewers" and who claims to have "over 2 million followers across social media, 2.5 billion views and … over 4 billion impressions in polls/quizzes"):

Visit turconews.click for more information.

Pro se Defendant Charles A. Peralo ("Defendant") has repeatedly failed to obey the Court's orders. Accordingly, the Court will impose a monetary sanction on him.

Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that a court may, sua sponte, "issue any just orders, including those authorized by Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(ii)–(vii), if a party or its attorney … fails to obey a scheduling or other pretrial order." Sanctions under Rule 16 are "designed to punish lawyers and parties for conduct which unreasonably delays or otherwise interferes with the expeditious management of trial preparation." …

Defendant has repeatedly and brazenly ignored this Court's orders. On June 11, 2026, the Court denied Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, noting it bore indicia of AI-generated material, and ordered Defendant to file an answer to Plaintiffs' first amended complaint no later than June 25. Defendant blew through that deadline.

On July 2, Plaintiffs informed the Court that Defendant refused to participate in drafting a joint scheduling report per the Court's June 12 Order, "[d]espite at least thirteen (13) e-mail follow-ups." Plaintiffs included screenshots of Defendant's responses to those emails, where Defendant said (among other things), "[y]ou are a fat [f**cking] loser," "you are my dancing monkey," and "you're a [f**cking] moron." [All expurgations are from the court opinion itself. -EV]

{In their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs represented that Defendant sent them the following email: "Sent you and the court the motion to dismiss your BS case and beat you with ChatGPT. When I send a bag of dog [s**t] to your office next week, should it be made out to Scamming Dan and Friends or Scamming Dan and Company?"}

The Court ordered the parties to meet and confer and file a joint scheduling report by July 10 and sua sponte granted Defendant an extension of his deadline to respond to the complaint until July 16. On July 10—the date the joint scheduling report was due—Plaintiffs informed the Court that Defendant failed to provide input and stated he was "in Las Vegas for a conference." Finally, on July 13, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause in writing why he should not be sanctioned for failure to meaningfully participate in this lawsuit no later than July 24 and warned him that failure to comply would result in sanctions without further notice. Defendant blew through this deadline too, and still has yet to respond to the complaint.

The Court harbors no doubt that Defendant's conduct amounts to bad faith. Not only have Plaintiffs served a copy of every relevant order on Defendant, on July 20, 2026, in response to a proposed order that Plaintiffs emailed to the Court, Defendant wrote (copying the Court):

I'll look over this BS when I have less important things to do. Meaning well… Anything.

But just a quick note. Save yourself some dignity and remove the part of me calling that idiot a [c**t].

You can play that recording over. She left the call and when I thought she was gone I went "What a [c**t]". I didn't directly call her that and for your own good, the judge/jury would see you guys as liars over it.

This conduct (ignoring court orders and insulting counsel) is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant shall pay one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) into the Court's sanction fund no later than August 14, 2026, and shall file a notice certifying he has done so. The Court further warns Defendant that engaging in any similar conduct going forward will result in more severe sanctions….

For more on the underlying dispute (a libel case stemming from a copyright infringement claim), see the Complaint and the Motion to Dismiss.

The post Not What Judges Want to See from Litigants appeared first on Reason.com.

Czytaj dalej u źródła